What is Scientific Methodology?
According to Richardson (1999), the scientific method is the way society finds to legitimize empirically acquired knowledge, that is, when knowledge is obtained through the scientific method , any researcher who repeats the investigation, under the same circumstances, may obtain a similar result.
That is, what Richardson meant is that scientific methodology enables other scholars and scientists to reproduce the same phenomena or conditions, similar by_cc781905-5cde-3194 -bb3b-136bad5cf58d_method cientific. This means that knowledge can be tested and replicated by different and unrelated sources and can reach extremely close results.
According to Demo (1987), methodology is an instrumental concern, dealing with the way for science to treat the theoretical and practical reality and is centered, generally, in the effort to transmit an initiation to the logical procedures turned to questions of causality, formal principles of identity, deduction and induction, objectivity, etc.
Eco (1977) adds that, when doing scientific work, the researcher will be learning to put his ideas in order , in order to organize the data obtained. Since the objective of a scientific work is to meet a certain pre-defined purpose, the use of a specific method becomes essential to guarantee the scope of what was planned.
In general, the scientific methodology is:
• Scientific methodology brings a concise way of how events and facts were constructed for the formulation of hypotheses. Through it, any reader of an article or serious academic content will be able to understand how the data were collected, in what way, and how they were analyzed. Making it clear to the reader, a simple way to replicate or analyze the results obtained by himself, if he has the necessary equipment and tools of course!
• Another important point of applying the scientific methodology is that during its process and some specific methodologies, there is a great effort in trying to suppress and eliminate biases which whatever they are, such as beliefs, mysticisms, tales, etc; that compromise a result from being or presenting itself as pure as possible, which can then result in something that is reliable.
• For a given type of research, there is a better set of methodologies that meet or provide a more coherent analysis or result, depending on the nature of what is being done. study. Knowing how to choose the methodology while applying a scientific study is as important as the result itself. It is through it that a group of people specialized in the area will be able to validate the method used and compare them with the results, making the entire research procedure from the beginning to the end as transparent as possible.
• The scientific method is also a resource that allows us to evaluate the hypotheses together with the results, since for every measurement, there is an associated uncertainty. That is, any type of measurement, whether by a person or even the equipment used, nothing is 100% accurate.
There is always an error and an uncertainty to be considered, (in other words, it is very rare for a scientific result to present 100% cohesive data made by scientists around the world _cc781905-5cde-3194-bb3b- 136bad5cf58d_from several laboratories without any relation to each other. But when the experiment is carried out in the most diverse ways and in a relatively large amount, errors are minimized and, through a statistical analysis, if the results have an approximation in the final data, there are indications of an approval of the hypothesis, if there is no approximation in the results of different laboratories, the entire data acquisition process or the hypotheses have to be revised, a scientifically serious work takes all these factors into account) and with that, _cc781905-5cde-3194-bb3b -136bad5cf58d_knowing how to use the methodology consistent with the research proposal, will help the scientist and future readers to analyze errors or procedural failures elements, allowing in the future, despite the results being coherent with the whole process, a more accurate review keeping the hypothesis valid, or not.